Skip to the case study

A thought in progressCoach 30-Day

For enquiries
kyle@sindstudios.com

We cut a 30-day product down to one interview

Coach 30-Day began as a system to take a new coach to a first paying client in a month. In about three weeks, research, a review board and a written decision record narrowed it to one private voice conversation that records what an expert knows and how sure it is.

  1. 30-day launch system1 to 7 September
  2. Two offer options8 September
  3. One interview14 September onward
Role
Research, product, design and engineering
Platform
Desktop-first web app, private and invite-only
Stack
Next.js, React, Supabase, OpenAI realtime voice over WebRTC
Timeline
Idea on 1 September 2026, current build merged by 18 September 2026
Review board
Survived, narrowly. 20 objections raised, none left unresolved
Status
In progress. Built and tested, not yet hosted or evaluated

Three framings in three weeks

The product kept the name Coach 30-Day while it changed shape. It is now called Expert Model V1.

  1. 1 to 7 September 2026

    First-Client Launch System

    One voice interview, then a 30-day loop of offer, outreach and buyer evidence, ending at a first paid coaching engagement.

  2. 8 September 2026

    V1 voice-interview prototype

    One 45-minute interview produces two offer options, and the coach picks one to test for 30 days.

  3. 14 September 2026 onward

    Expert Model V1

    One private voice conversation that records what an expert knows, then stops before any commercial strategy.

The problem

Plenty of people know their field well enough to help someone, and still cannot turn that into a focused market, a credible offer or a first paying client.

The original plan was to fix all of that in 30 days. The research argued against it. The first market scan found the 30-day, done-for-you launch promise already taken, by offers like a $197 done-for-you launch and a 12-week accelerator. Courses and marketplaces show the steps and leave a novice to assemble them. General AI tools can summarise a conversation, but they do not reliably separate what the expert actually said from market guesses and the model's own inference.

That pointed to a smaller, sharper problem. An expert's know-how is often stronger than their ability to put it into words and carry it into later strategy work. Anything built on top of that record, from an offer to a brand, needs to know which parts came from the expert and which were guessed.

The solution

Expert Model V1 is one private conversation, up to 45 minutes, with an AI voice guide. An expert is invited by email, signs in with a one-time link, and accepts a consent screen before the microphone is ever requested. That screen says plainly what happens: text is kept, OpenAI processes the transcript, no audio is stored, and this is not therapy. The guide opens by admitting it is still learning to listen and asks to be corrected, then asks about one concrete time someone relied on the expert's judgment.

Beside the conversation, a second model maintains a structured board. Each claim is labelled as direct evidence, a market hypothesis, an interpretation, a correction or needing validation, with a confidence level and references back to the transcript. The board has six fixed sections, visited in whatever order the conversation needs. Once all six are confirmed, the expert asks for a spoken recap, makes final corrections and confirms the record. Offers, pricing and brand are left to people, working by hand afterwards.

Feature highlights

  • Consent before the microphone.

    The consent screen asks for no microphone access and starts nothing until the expert ticks and accepts.

  • Evidence labels on every claim.

    Claims without transcript references or confirmation are rejected before they reach the board.

  • Corrections by voice.

    Experts fix the record by speaking, and each correction is kept as a claim, not written over.

  • Pick up where you left off.

    An interrupted interview reconnects from the confirmed record without repeating the opening.

  • A hard stop on the server.

    Sessions end at 45 minutes, enforced by a server job that runs every minute, not the browser timer.

The thinking

Seven decisions from the dated record. Turn a card to read why.

What we cut

  • The 30-day loop of daily prospect suggestions, review blocks and checkpoints.

    Designed, never built.
  • Any AI output on offers, pricing, ideal customer profiles, brand or go-to-market.

  • The $300 launch price, the $150 monthly fee, the refund guarantee and the five-seat pre-sale.

  • Prospecting, content and payments.

  • Speed, done-for-you delivery and vertical focus as selling points.

    The review board judged them table stakes.
  • Vanity metrics: waitlist size, interviews completed, assets generated and post-interview NPS.

  • Raw audio, and with it, replay.

  • A draggable, sticky-note canvas for the board.

Each cut is in the dated decision record, with its reason.

One head, six thought cards, each marked with how we know it

The two board images are static reconstructions with a fictional expert, not captures of a live session. There is no video, on purpose.

Illustrative
Illustrative board: on the left, Begin with the work you know best with a Pause interview button. On the right, What we have confirmed, with claims tagged direct evidence, confirmed interpretation or correction, each with a confidence level.
Illustrative: the interview board with four of six sections filled. Invented content.
Illustrative
Illustrative board on a narrow screen: the interview controls stacked above confirmed sections with evidence labels.
Illustrative: the board on a narrow screen, filled with an invented example.
From the real app
The private sign-in page on desktop: the headline Your experience is the starting point, beside a form to email a one-time sign-in link.
The private sign-in page, still carrying copy from the earlier offer-focused version.
From the real app
The same sign-in page on a phone: the headline stacked above the email form.
The same sign-in page on a phone, from the real app.

What's next

The interview flow is built and tested but not yet hosted or evaluated.

Next come the expert's summary download, operator exports, and a first read of the validation bets written before the build.

Got a big idea that needs cutting down? Talk to us.

kyle@sindstudios.com
Kyle reads every message.

The Poetry in Motion home page hero in deep blue beside a photo of Trilby by the water.Next thought · Poetry in MotionA membership video studio for one teacherRead it